Vital F1 | 'clarification' on defensive driving guidelines
Vital Login
Social Login

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's F1, It's Vital'

'clarification' on defensive driving guidelines

Back in January the FIA announced a tweak to how drivers could defend their position on the track.

It had been thought that the tweak would prevent drivers who make a move to defend their position away from the racing line, to return to it, thus blocking the attacking driver twice.

This scenario was seen multiple times during the course of the 2011 season and it was always going to be interesting to see how it would be enforced by the race stewards during the 2012 season and whether the advantage would now be handed to the attacking driver.

Well with the new season at its half way point, we've had a number of incidents which has meant that this rule has come under the spotlight.

In Bahrain Nico Rosberg, took a very aggressive approach towards defending his position against Lewis Hamilton, so much so that the Mercedes driver actually put two wheels off the track while the McLaren was alongside him.

The German was then under investigation for his defensive moves while attempting to keep the Ferrari of Fernando Alonso behind him later on in the same race.

The race stewards eventually sided with Rosberg, but calls were being made for clarification on the guidelines by the drivers, with Alonso making sarcastic tweets about the stewards decision.

In Valencia, Maldonado was punished for crashing into Lewis Hamilton in the closing stages of the race. The Williams driver attempted to blame the McLaren driver for pushing him off the track, but the stewards didn't agree and gave Maldonado a post-race time penalty.

While most agreed with the stewards decision, some Formula One journalists could see the point Maldonado was making in regards to the current regulations.

So before the British Grand Prix at Silverstone, FIA race director Charlie Whiting wrote to all the teams to clarify their position.

Autosport Magazine have managed to obtain a copy of this letter and have quoted parts of the letter in a recent article on their website.

'any driver defending his position on a straight and before any braking area may use the full width of the track during his first move provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason.'

It continued: 'For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion'.'

Now this wouldn't appear to avoid doubt at all, just by looking at the incidents involving Rosberg and Hamilton in Bahrain and Hamilton and Maldonado in Valencia, you could still interpret the moves differently.

In Bahrain, Hamilton would have had a 'significant portion' of his car alongside Rosberg before the Mercedes used the full width of the road, so that would now lay blame on Rosberg.

In Valencia, despite the fact that Maldonado had put his car on the outside of the turn, he too would have had a 'significant portion' of his car alongside Hamilton, simply because he broke later than the McLaren. He then remained alongside him going into the chicane because he didn't attempt to take the initial turn and left the track.

So where does blame sit in this incident? Does it still sit with Maldonado for leaving the circuit and failing to rejoin the track in a safe manner or is Hamilton now to blame because the Brit didn't leave him enough of the track to take the corner?








Join Vital F1

It's easy to join up and join in on VitalF1.com, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

If you are already a member of Vital Football, your logins will automatically work on VitalF1.com!

The Journalist

Writer: Red5 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday July 13 2012

Time: 10:00AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Vital F1 Articles

Blog: Monaco GP Report (Sunday May 29 2016)

2016 Monaco GP - Race (Sunday May 29 2016)

Blog: Monaco Qualifying (Saturday May 28 2016)

2016 Monaco GP - Qualifying (Saturday May 28 2016)

2016 Monaco GP - FP3 (Saturday May 28 2016)

2016 Monaco GP - FP2 (Thursday May 26 2016)

2016 Monaco GP - FP1 (Thursday May 26 2016)

Blog: Monaco Preview (Thursday May 26 2016)

Who will win in Monaco? (Monday May 23 2016)

Lauda slams Hamilton (Tuesday May 17 2016)

Seven score race wins in Spain (Tuesday May 17 2016)

Mercedes duo crash (Monday May 16 2016)

Blog: Spanish GP Report (Sunday May 15 2016)

2016 Spain GP - Race (Sunday May 15 2016)

Blog: Barcelona Qualifying (Saturday May 14 2016)

2016 Spain GP - Qualifying (Saturday May 14 2016)

2016 Spain GP - FP3 (Saturday May 14 2016)

2016 Spanish GP - FP2 (Friday May 13 2016)

2016 Spanish GP - FP1 (Friday May 13 2016)

Blog: Barcelona Preview (Wednesday May 11 2016)

Renault have big plans for Spain (Wednesday May 11 2016)

Who will reign in Spain? (Monday May 9 2016)

Bottas content with Russia finish (Thursday May 5 2016)

What was Sebastian to do? Fly? (Wednesday May 4 2016)

Russian roulette (Monday May 2 2016)

Blog: Russian GP Report (Monday May 2 2016)

2016 Russia GP - Race (Sunday May 1 2016)

2016 Russia GP - Qualifying (Saturday April 30 2016)

2016 Russia GP - FP3 (Saturday April 30 2016)

2016 Russia GP - FP2 (Saturday April 30 2016)

2016 Russia GP - FP1 (Friday April 29 2016)

Hamilton has one eye on retirement (Friday April 29 2016)

Horner praise for Renault (Thursday April 28 2016)

Booth returns to Formula One (Thursday April 28 2016)

Alonso believes he's still the best (Wednesday April 27 2016)

Hamilton can re-use China engine (Wednesday April 27 2016)

Blog: Sochi Preview (Tuesday April 26 2016)

Who will win in Russia? (Monday April 25 2016)

Red Bull's wings no longer clipped? (Thursday April 21 2016)

Hamilton is the benchmark says Rosberg (Wednesday April 20 2016)

Grosjean slams 'idiotic' Ericsson (Wednesday April 20 2016)

Ricciardo is all smiles (Tuesday April 19 2016)

Four take maximum points in China (Monday April 18 2016)

Embarrassed Vettel slams Kvyat (Monday April 18 2016)

Blog: Chinese GP Report (Sunday April 17 2016)

2016 China GP - Race (Sunday April 17 2016)

Blog: Shanghai Qualifying (Saturday April 16 2016)

2016 China GP - Qualifying (Saturday April 16 2016)

2016 China GP - FP3 (Saturday April 16 2016)

2016 China GP - FP2 (Friday April 15 2016)

2016 China GP - FP1 (Friday April 15 2016)

Kick in the goonies for Hamilton (Thursday April 14 2016)

Good things can happen for Renault (Wednesday April 13 2016)

Has Hamilton lost his spark? (Wednesday April 13 2016)

Blog: Shanghai Preview (Wednesday April 13 2016)

Tyre chaos in China? (Tuesday April 12 2016)

Who will win in China? (Monday April 11 2016)

Haas targeting points from every race (Wednesday April 6 2016)

Archived Vital F1 Articles

List All Vital F1 Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Red5 1088
2. DJ 1040
3. The Fear 773
4. Villaininthemerde 612
5. johnkelv 584
6. Druss_the_Legend 557
7. Push The Button 477
8. col8 334
9. The Intimidator 182
10. __villa__ 145

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Were Mercedes right to ask Rosberg to pull over?
Yes - Hamiton was faster 100%
No - Rosberg held championship advantage 0%