Vital F1 | Pirelli storm continues
Vital Login
Social Login

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's F1, It's Vital'

Pirelli storm continues

Pirelli have completed their post-mortem on just what contributed to the farcical and dangerous scenes we witnessed at the British Grand Prix.

The Italian tyre manufacturer announced that a series of contributing factors led to the tyre blowouts, that saw four high speed incidents during the race including to Lewis Hamilton, who was leading the race at his home Grand Prix at the time.

Pirelli were quick to state that the 2013 tyres were safe and that the 2013 tyres 'does not compromise driver safety in any way if used in the correct manner'.

The official statement partly blamed the Silverstone track, quoting 'high kerbs' as an issue, while also pointed the finger at the Formula One teams for mounting the rear tyres the wrong way around, running low tyre pressures, using extreme cambers and the angle at which the wheel is mounted on the suspension.

Pirelli stated that all rear tyre failures occurred on cars that had mounted the tyres the wrong way round a practice that had been common this season and was not illegal.

Pirelli admitted that they had underestimated the effect it could have.

A second statement released by Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembery just hours later however clarified that: 'In no way are we intending to create arguments or attack anybody. We have taken our responsibilities upon ourselves.

'But not having full control over all the elements that impact on the use of the tyres, we need everybody's contribution. With regard to this, we are receiving the full support of all the parties involved, for which we are very grateful.'


In response Pirelli will introduce modified tyres for this weekend's German Grand Prix with Kevlar-belt tyres [previously used in 2012] replacing the steel versions used this season.

This was a change that Pirelli had wanted to make prior to the British Grand Prix after testing them in Canada, but Pirelli failed to receive the unanimous backing of the Formula One teams to do it.

Changes to the regulations by the FIA in the wake of the Silverstone race has meant that Pirelli can now make the change and a new range of tyres will also be developed in time for the Hungarian Grand Prix in a few weeks time.

Kevlar will be used as the belt where the rubber is mounted, it is designed to be more puncture resistant, but the concern for some teams is that it will make the tyres run about 10c cooler than before, which of course will mean a change in tyre performance.

In a season dominated by tyre performance that could see a shift in cars performance with the changes helping some teams and hindering those that did have a grip on the current tyres.

The full Pirelli statement is on formula1.com.








Join Vital F1

It's easy to join up and join in on VitalF1.com, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

If you are already a member of Vital Football, your logins will automatically work on VitalF1.com!

The Journalist

Writer: Red5 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday July 3 2013

Time: 9:20AM

Your Comments

how can pirelli say that the tyres are safe,we all saw what happened!
The Fear
Pirelli were quick to state that the 2013 tyres were safe and that the 2013 tyres 'does not compromise driver safety in any way if used in the correct manner'. Clearly the teams were not using the tyres in the correct manner, its their job to find the limits, but stop blaming the tyre maker.
johnkelv
Combination of factors, however Motor Sport has always been about pushing the limits and the tyres shouldn't be failing in such a spectacular way. However the testing ban is what has hindered Pirelli so all the changes following last weekend should mean this can be avoided in the future.
red5
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Vital F1 Articles

Is Formula E a threat to Formula One? (Wednesday August 16 2017)

F1 to introduce standardised parts? (Monday August 14 2017)

Sainz fake news (Saturday August 12 2017)

Hungaroring set for revamp (Wednesday August 9 2017)

Drivers mixed on Halo introduction (Monday August 7 2017)

Sauber ditch Honda for Ferrari (Thursday August 3 2017)

Blog: Hungarian GP Report (Wednesday August 2 2017)

2017 Hungarian GP - Race (Sunday July 30 2017)

2017 Hungarian GP - Qualifying (Saturday July 29 2017)

2017 Hungarian GP - FP3 (Saturday July 29 2017)

2017 Hungarian GP - FP2 (Friday July 28 2017)

2017 Hungarian GP - FP1 (Friday July 28 2017)

Halo will debut in F1 in 2018 (Friday July 28 2017)

Blog: Hungaroring Preview (Thursday July 27 2017)

Cosworth to return to Formula One? (Wednesday July 26 2017)

Who will win in Hungary (Monday July 24 2017)

Sympathy for Kvyat? (Thursday July 20 2017)

Vettel plays down Silverstone swing (Wednesday July 19 2017)

Hamiltonís takeover (Tuesday July 18 2017)

Blog: British GP Report (Monday July 17 2017)

2017 British GP - Race (Sunday July 16 2017)

Blog: Silverstone Qualifying (Sunday July 16 2017)

2017 British GP - Qualifying (Sunday July 16 2017)

2017 British GP - FP3 (Sunday July 16 2017)

2017 British GP - FP2 (Friday July 14 2017)

2017 British GP - FP1 (Friday July 14 2017)

Who will win the British Grand Prix? (Thursday July 13 2017)

Blog: Silverstone Preview (Wednesday July 12 2017)

Blog: Austrian GP Report (Monday July 10 2017)

2017 Austria GP - Race (Sunday July 9 2017)

Blog: Red Bull Ring Qualifying (Saturday July 8 2017)

2017 Austria GP - Qualifying (Saturday July 8 2017)

2017 Austria GP - FP3 (Saturday July 8 2017)

2017 Austria GP - FP2 (Friday July 7 2017)

2017 Austrian GP - FP1 (Friday July 7 2017)

Blog: Red Bull Ring Preview (Thursday July 6 2017)

Hulkenberg sets sights on 2018 (Wednesday July 5 2017)

Who will win in Austria? (Monday July 3 2017)

The Force is not with India (Thursday June 29 2017)

Lauda and Wolff on Vettel (Wednesday June 28 2017)

Hamilton and Ricciardo slam Vettel (Tuesday June 27 2017)

Blog: Azerbaijan GP Report (Monday June 26 2017)

2017 Azerbaijan GP - Race (Sunday June 25 2017)

Blog: Baku Qualifying (Saturday June 24 2017)

2017 Azerbaijan GP - Qualifying (Saturday June 24 2017)

2017 Azerbaijan GP - FP3 (Saturday June 24 2017)

2017 Azerbaijan GP - FP2 (Friday June 23 2017)

2017 Azerbaijan GP - FP1 (Friday June 23 2017)

Blog: Baku Preview (Thursday June 22 2017)

F1 too boring for Malaysia (Wednesday June 21 2017)

Who will win in Baku? (Monday June 19 2017)

Kvyat rant at 'circus' stewarding (Thursday June 15 2017)

Merc hit Ferrari with heavy blow (Tuesday June 13 2017)

Blog: Canadian GP Report (Monday June 12 2017)

2017 Canada GP - Race (Sunday June 11 2017)

Blog: Montreal Qualifying (Sunday June 11 2017)

2017 Canada GP - Qualifying (Saturday June 10 2017)

2017 Canada GP - FP3 (Saturday June 10 2017)

2017 Canada GP - FP2 (Friday June 9 2017)

2017 Canada GP - FP1 (Friday June 9 2017)

Formula One season set to expand (Thursday June 8 2017)

Blog: Montreal Preview (Tuesday June 6 2017)

Who will win in Canada? (Monday June 5 2017)

Youngster set to return to F1 (Friday June 2 2017)

Mercedes war with Ferrari not over (Wednesday May 31 2017)

All talk on Ferrari (Tuesday May 30 2017)

Blog: Monaco GP Report (Monday May 29 2017)

2017 Monaco GP - Race (Sunday May 28 2017)

Blog: Monaco Qualifying (Saturday May 27 2017)

2017 Monaco GP - Qualifying (Saturday May 27 2017)

2017 Monaco GP - FP3 (Saturday May 27 2017)

2017 Monaco GP - FP2 (Thursday May 25 2017)

2017 Monaco GP - FP1 (Thursday May 25 2017)

Blog: Monaco Preview (Wednesday May 24 2017)

Who will win in Monaco? (Monday May 22 2017)

Archived Vital F1 Articles

List All Vital F1 Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. DJ 1160
2. Red5 1120
3. The Fear 773
4. Villaininthemerde 612
5. johnkelv 601
6. Druss_the_Legend 590
7. Push The Button 503
8. col8 334
9. The Intimidator 211
10. VanGisbergen2013 168

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Was Hamilton right to move over for Bottas?
No 9%
Yes - It was a team order 33%
Yes - But naive team order 58%