Vital F1 | Horner threatens engine war
Vital Login
Social Login

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's F1, It's Vital'

Horner threatens engine war

Despite spiralling costs at the expense of multiple F1 teams, Formula One could be on the brink of an engine war.

That's the view of Red Bull Racing's team principal Christian Horner, who wants to see an unfreeze to the current engine regulations.

Currently engine manufacturers are able to make a number of changes between Formula One seasons.

It isn't clear quite how much can be changes but Mercedes have previously been quoted as saying that 92% of the engine design can be altered ahead of next season.

But under the current regulations, after a certain date in the calendar, Formula One engine manufacturers are not allowed to make any further developments to their engines.

The engine freeze was made a regulation in a move to try and limit spending on engines after a huge investment was made to switch from the normal aspirated v8 engines, to the new era of v6 turbo-hybrid power-plants.

Engine suppliers are limited to only being able to make alterations to engine mapping and software during the season, with any changes to mechanical parts limited to special occasions with advanced permission in the case of reliability, safety or cost.

Since the change in regulations for 2014, Mercedes have dominated, either with their own car or with customer teams Williams, McLaren and Force India.

Obviously with Mercedes dominating, rivals Ferrari and Renault called for the engine freeze to be lifted, to improve competition.

Whilst Honda who join Formula One in 2015 with McLaren have also joined with Ferrari and Renault, as they would obviously also benefit from further development time.

German manufacturers Mercedes however believe that there is enough scope to upgrade in the off-season and in a time of spiralling costs and wanting to lower spending, lifting the engine freeze would see costs increase dramatically.

For any rule changes to happen for 2015, all the teams have to come to a unanimous decision.

However the regulations are not in place for 2016 and beyond and Horner believes that if Mercedes do not cooperate now, then a full out engine war will take place in the future.

'There are no guarantees we can close that gap significantly to Mercedes but not having the opportunity to do so seems pretty unpalatable, I think that's the only option because with a majority vote '16, '17, '18 can be open, which is ridiculous because it just means we're all going to end up spending a lot more money over a longer period of time, whereas it should be opened to allow Renault, Ferrari, Honda to close the gap.' Horner told the BBC.

At a time when Marussia and Caterham have already gone into administration and smaller teams such as Sauber, Lotus and Force India are known to also be struggling financially. Even larger engine costs is ridiculous. Which is the stance that Mercedes boss Toto Wolff has taken: 'I don't think it's the way forward trying to unsettle the system and saying if you don't agree for '15 , we are going to turn the whole thing upside down, [and have an] engine war.

'You're looking a bit too narrow on your own team's performance and not considering what is going on around you in F1.'

Now considering Mercedes hold the competitive advantage that is a convenient stance to take and if they had been in the shoes of Ferrari who knows if they would have still held that view.

That said, that view is the correct one.

The change in engine regulations was an expensive one. The only way to limit that cost going forward is to have a freeze on engine development during the season.

That was why it was implemented in the first place.

The irony should also not be lost that it was Red Bull's engine partner Renault who heavily pushed for the engine change to v6 turbo-hybrid engines and then got the manufacturing of the system wrong which put them at a disadvantage on the track.

Mercedes would also not have been interested in Formula One if it had not been for the engine change, whilst Honda would also have never returned to Formula One.

The change was needed to keep Formula One at the forefront of technology, something which is in the very DNA of F1.

But in a prime example of why the teams should not be involved in the running of the sport, Horner would back calls to return to the older v8 engines.

'Nobody likes to go backwards but sometimes desperate means require desperate measures, You look at the costs of these power units. How sustainable is it for all the teams and indeed the manufacturers?

'I think it's extremely unlikely but if we were rational about it then yes we would.'

When it was pointed out that Mercedes, Renault and Honda would argue that they'd leave the sport under those circumstances he said: 'They might pull out anyway [because of the increasing costs]. It's just a crazy situation; completely nuts.'

If ever the hypocritical world of Formula One was summed up in a single sentence, that was it.

Back an engine unfreeze which would increase costs, but then admit that engine suppliers could pull out of Formula One over increased costs.

It's no wonder Formula One is in turmoil.

Join Vital F1

It's easy to join up and join in on, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

If you are already a member of Vital Football, your logins will automatically work on!

The Journalist

Writer: Red5 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday November 12 2014

Time: 10:00AM


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Vital F1 Articles

Brawn wants F1 league table for tracks (Friday February 23 2018)

Mercedes uncertain on who will be a threat (Thursday February 22 2018)

Verstappen dreading Halo introduction (Wednesday February 21 2018)

Haas want to close the gap to Ferrari (Tuesday February 20 2018)

Williams defend inexperienced line-up (Monday February 19 2018)

Renault still looking to change the rules (Thursday February 15 2018)

London double-decker bus could sit on Halo (Wednesday February 14 2018)

Could Hamilton return to McLaren? (Tuesday February 13 2018)

Massa gave no guidance to Stroll (Tuesday February 13 2018)

Wehrlein returns to DTM (Monday February 12 2018)

Grid Girls to be replaced by Grid Kids (Monday February 12 2018)

Former champ calls for 26 car grids (Friday February 9 2018)

Alonso to compete at Le Mans (Tuesday February 6 2018)

Force India & Sauber withdraw EU complaint (Wednesday January 31 2018)

F1 set to jump on Verstappen bandwagon (Tuesday January 30 2018)

Lauda takes dig at Red Bull (Friday January 26 2018)

Cosworth keen on F1 return (Thursday January 25 2018)

Former champs back Hamilton (Wednesday January 24 2018)

All you need to know for F1 in 2018 (Tuesday January 23 2018)

Full Formula One line-up for 2018 set (Monday January 22 2018)

Could Red Bull be favourites for 2018? (Wednesday January 17 2018)

Force India sign F2 race winner (Friday January 12 2018)

Massa backing Williams in 2018 (Thursday January 11 2018)

F1 regulations unreasonable says Honda (Wednesday January 10 2018)

Pirelli receive Red Bull backing (Tuesday January 9 2018)

Aston Martin in demand (Monday January 8 2018)

Haas positive 2018 car will be better (Thursday January 4 2018)

Wehrlein set to bid goodbye to F1 (Wednesday January 3 2018)

Hamilton critical of French GP return (Tuesday January 2 2018)

Liberty get backing from Horner (Saturday December 30 2017)

F1 attendance figures on the rise (Wednesday December 27 2017)

Tost concentraing in Honda positives (Wednesday December 27 2017)

Merry Christmas from VitalF1 (Monday December 25 2017)

Todt to enjoy 12 years as FIA president (Sunday December 24 2017)

What's in a number? (Wednesday December 20 2017)

Grid penalty change for 2018 (Tuesday December 19 2017)

Hamilton and Vettel clash (Monday December 18 2017)

Ocon eyes Mercedes seat for 2019 (Friday December 15 2017)

Alonso targets race wins in 2018 (Thursday December 14 2017)

Hamilton and Alonso praise Pirelli (Monday December 11 2017)

All female racing series to support F1? (Wednesday December 6 2017)

Alfa Romeo name returns to F1 (Monday December 4 2017)

Hamilton poor form down to partying (Thursday November 30 2017)

More change in F1, but this one is positive (Wednesday November 29 2017)

Liberty Media alienating F1 fans? (Tuesday November 28 2017)

Blog: Abu Dhabi GP Report (Monday November 27 2017)

2017 Abu Dhabi GP - Race (Sunday November 26 2017)

Blog: Abu Dhabi Qualifying (Saturday November 25 2017)

2017 Abu Dhabi GP - Qualifying (Saturday November 25 2017)

2017 Abu Dhabi GP - FP3 (Saturday November 25 2017)

2017 Abu Dhabi GP - FP2 (Friday November 24 2017)

2017 Abu Dhabi GP - FP1 (Friday November 24 2017)

Expanded calendar for Formula 2 and GP3 (Friday November 24 2017)

Formula One going soft (Thursday November 23 2017)

Blog: Abu Dhabi Preview (Thursday November 23 2017)

Force India name change hits the buffers (Wednesday November 22 2017)

Who will win in Abu Dhabi? (Monday November 20 2017)

Blog: Brazilian GP Report (Tuesday November 14 2017)

2017 Brazil GP - Race (Monday November 13 2017)

Blog: Interlagos Qualifying (Sunday November 12 2017)

2017 Brazil GP - Qualifying (Saturday November 11 2017)

2017 Brazil GP - FP3 (Saturday November 11 2017)

2017 Brazil GP - FP2 (Friday November 10 2017)

2017 Brazil GP - FP1 (Friday November 10 2017)

Blog: Interlagos Preview (Thursday November 9 2017)

Massa announces second retirement (Wednesday November 8 2017)

Hamilton only has eyes for Formula One (Tuesday November 7 2017)

Archived Vital F1 Articles

List All Vital F1 Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. DJ 1213
2. Red5 1129
3. The Fear 773
4. Villaininthemerde 612
5. johnkelv 601
6. Druss_the_Legend 596
7. Push The Button 513
8. col8 334
9. The Intimidator 221
10. VanGisbergen2013 182

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Who is going to win in Australia?
Hamilton 26%
Bottas 0%
Vettel 37%
Raikkonen 0%
Verstappen 25%
Ricciardo 12%
Someone else 0%