• as seen on newsnow.co.uk

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's F1, It's Vital'

Lotus saga to come to an end?

Could the battle over the use of the Lotus name be coming to an end?

In one of the most boring and confusing episodes of Formula One branding, a Formula 1 Commission meeting in Geneva on November 3rd could see the conclusion of the legal dispute between Team Lotus [owned by Tony Fernandes] and Group Lotus [owned by Proton].

The battle has gone on throughout the season and has seen the team formally owned by Renault running as Lotus Renault GP and the Tony Fernandes outfit running as Team Lotus.

A High Court decision in London back in May failed to clear the mess up with the ruling permitting Team Lotus to continue to race in Formula One under the name following the legal dispute with Group Lotus.

The court hearing had been a long time in coming following a fall out between the two parties in 2010.

That decision meant that for the remainder of the 2011 season, they have continued to race with the Team Lotus badge and name and in the traditional Lotus racing colours of British racing green. While Group Lotus [who have widely be known as Renault despite large Lotus advertising] have continued to race with the black and gold livery made famous by the John Player Special sponsorship of Lotus in the 1980's.

The decision also stated that in the future they were the only team who could race as simply 'Lotus'. In September hints began to drop that a deal could be reached for 2012 and that proposal will now be voted on at the Formula 1 Commission.

The poll will decide if Team Lotus can become Caterham and Renault can become Lotus.

The proposal is unlikely to come up against much opposition with most in the sport just wanting a decision to come and end the complications and confusions.

However Formula One teams are set on tightening the rules to prevent a similar scenario happening again.

'we want to clarify the fact that for the future we need to put certain rules in place in order to make sure that this is not becoming every two weeks a trade off position that some teams can use.' Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali told Autosport Magazine after a FOTA meeting which had discussed the proposal.

He added: 'to have two Lotuses can cause confusion, but we need to establish the rules to say, yes we can do it, or sorry that is not possible.'

The name change also suites Renault who sold the team in 2009 to Genii Capital.

'We sold the team two years ago, and the strategy was not to cut the whole relationship with the team because, when you are a big car maker, you cannot stop like that, The strategy decision was to decline step-by-step, to push the technical partnership. Renault Sport's managing director Jean-Francois Caubet told Autosport Magazine.

'With the chassis name, it was a little bit embarrassing for Renault because the control of the team was done by Genii, the main sponsor was Lotus and for the British press it was a Renault team!

'We didn't push too much to change, but we asked Bernie if he could help us, and Lotus will be a good solution.'









Join Vital F1

It's easy to join up and join in on VitalF1.com, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

If you are already a member of Vital Football, your logins will automatically work on VitalF1.com!

Writer: Red5 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday October 20 2011

Time: 12:00PM

 

Have Your Say

Click here to register an account

Recent Articles

Can Mercedes win in Monaco? (Friday May 24 2013)

Button happy with Monaco form (Friday May 24 2013)

Pirelli could quit Formula One (Friday May 24 2013)

Lotus hope to keep Raikkonen (Wednesday May 22 2013)

BMW deny F1 return (Tuesday May 21 2013)

FIA reject tyre change plan (Tuesday May 21 2013)

Pirelli will change the tyres (Monday May 20 2013)

2013 Spa GP - Weekend recap - Massa (Wednesday May 15 2013)

VF1blog: Alonso's Home Run (Monday May 13 2013)

2013 Spa GP - Race - Result (Sunday May 12 2013)

Lotus seek improvements (Thursday May 9 2013)

Lessons learned for Silverstone (Thursday May 2 2013)

Remembering Ayrton (Wednesday May 1 2013)

The battle for survival (Monday April 29 2013)

Pirelli to introduce new hard tyre (Friday April 26 2013)

Hamilton enjoying new challenge (Thursday April 25 2013)

2013 Bah GP - Weekend recap - Vettel (Wednesday April 24 2013)

2013 Bah GP - Weekend recap - Grosjean (Wednesday April 24 2013)

Poll Result: Bahrain (Tuesday April 23 2013)

VF1blog: Deja Vu In The Desert (Monday April 22 2013)

2013 Bah GP - Race - Result (Sunday April 21 2013)

Red Bull conspiracy theories (Wednesday April 17 2013)

Kovalainen makes Caterham return (Wednesday April 17 2013)

Pirelli ditch soft tyre (Wednesday April 17 2013)

VF1blog: Red revolution (Tuesday April 16 2013)

VF1blog: Fernando Flies for Ferrari (Tuesday April 16 2013)

Who will win in Bahrain? (Tuesday April 16 2013)

2013 Chi GP - Race - Result (Sunday April 14 2013)

2013 Chi GP - Qualifying - Result (Saturday April 13 2013)

Horner hits back (Friday April 12 2013)

Red Bull to reduce 'team orders' (Friday April 12 2013)

Alonso backs pit-stop call (Thursday April 11 2013)

Mistakes were made says Rosberg (Thursday April 11 2013)

Webber will race on (Thursday April 11 2013)

Massa targets Ferrari improvement (Wednesday April 10 2013)

McLaren back on track (Wednesday April 10 2013)

Horner speaks out against RRA (Tuesday April 9 2013)

Who will win in China? (Tuesday April 9 2013)

Williams hoping to improve (Tuesday April 9 2013)

Archived Articles

List All Vital F1 Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Red5 917
2. DJ 768
3. The Fear 738
4. Villaininthemerde 611
5. johnkelv 519
6. Druss_the_Legend 487
7. Push The Button 407
8. col8 334
9. __villa__ 145
10. The Intimidator 118

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Should F1 stick with Pirelli for 2014?
Yes 16%
No 42%
I don't care about tyres! 42%