Vital F1 | Blog: Melbourne Qualifying
Vital Login
Social Login

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's F1, It's Vital'

Blog: Melbourne Qualifying



Cloud with a silver lining

As the 19th century German Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke the Elder once said, 'No battle plan ever survives contact with the enemy'. And to put it in F1 terms no new qualifying system survives contact with the sport's reality. Or at least this one didn't.

It sounded nice in theory. The clock ticking down continuously and drivers being eliminated incrementally. But it reckoned without F1 as it is. Tyres are designed to degrade and available sets of the softest tyres are finite. These two things coming together mean one chance effectively to set a time. And it showed - today marks tended to be set early and then many under threat of elimination had given up well ahead of the cut-off time as they'd run out of tyres. Even if they had been minded to reply the new system didn't give them an opportunity to as times were too tight. Much of the qualifying hour became an absurd exercise in watching the clock ticking down as cars sat in the garage. Their inevitable exit already set.

Underlining the absurdity, only the two Mercs - not even the Ferraris in other words - went out for a final effort at the end. Then when the pole was won and we got the usual back-slapping on the pit wall, then as the drivers wandered into the weighbridge with their job done, someone noticed that there still was three minutes plus remaining on the clock as it ticked down gingerly, yet removing drivers one at a time. It rather encapsulated the farce.

Journalist Stuart Codling summed it up too: 'We could make something of this. 'Capitulation Hour' - points awarded to the drivers who are first to park up.' Not for the first time, F1 goes Python-esque.

Teams are amoral of course, they do what they think is best for them. And all power to them. The problem is the system.

Toto Wolff, whose cars had just locked out the front row, called it 'rubbish'. Christian Horner apologised on behalf of the sport. It wasn't a good day.

It didn't even deliver on its apparent unique selling point of a jumbled grid to make tomorrow more interesting. The grid is one that the most tepid of systems could have given us; much of it is in Noah's Ark formation and the few that aren't mainly could be explained by unusual circumstances (Valtteri Bottas down in P11 made a mistake and Daniil Kvyat in P18 had a suspected problem).

There was a strong whiff of 'I told you so' in the paddock afterwards. But while recrimination doesn't really get us anywhere some of the claims were from those present at the meeting when this new system was being agreed, and from people who voted for it. Let us not forget either that this was voted through unanimously at the F1 Commission. A few, no doubt, were venturing with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight vision. Or perhaps were minded of covering their tracks.

But certainly engineers, and drivers who they spend a lot of time in conversation with, foresaw what we got today at least to some extent. Given in the quote at the outset they represent 'the enemy' as it were it shows the importance of bringing them into such conversations. Today we certainly also witnessed the perils of pushing a new system through too quickly.

'I don't see the point why everyone is surprised' said Sebastian Vettel, leading the charge. 'We all said what is going to happen. It happened...We were told to wait and see. Now we saw and I don't think it was very exciting.'

As for what happens next, as ever in dysfunctional F1 anything is possible but the sense that this quali in its current spec can't be continued with was near unanimous afterwards (heck, it says something when even this sport's power brokers agree). 'I don't like it, it's not acceptable and it's got to change. It doesn't work and it has to go before Bahrain.' said Martin Brundle on TV. 'It needs putting in the skip.'

It's therefore hard to see how it can continue. A 'hybrid' system where we keep Q1 and Q2 as they were today (when in fairness it wasn't quite as bad) and return to the 'old' system for Q3 - something that was actually proposed in the close season - or else a wholesale return to the previous system, seem most likely.

'I think that discussion's going to take place' said Wolff. While Nico Rosberg noted: 'It's good F1 tries [ideas] but we have to go back, for the last one [Q3] especially'.

But if the new qualifying was a flop at least today it found a worthy pole man. Lewis Hamilton once again blitzed the field, and his Mercedes team mate Rosberg next up blitzed everyone else. This after post-testing analysis which suggested that Ferrari could be in Merc's vicinity, and FP3 that suggested something similar. But no, on today's evidence from the mid-point of Q2 Merc had something in hand on the rest. Again. In more ways than one it seemed very familiar.

Lewis as he does when content mused afterwards in his inimitable, almost dream-like, way: 'They were some sexy laps, it felt so good, just flowing...'. It also was his landmark pole number 50 of his F1 career.

Rosberg meanwhile did not seek to hide. 'The last lap was good...just Lewis did a better job. That's it'.

Rosberg insisted he still had possibilities to attack Lewis tomorrow, while Vettel reckoned he'll be closer come the race. But Lewis looks hard to beat.

And while the round reaction to on-track matters and Mercedes's dominance is ho hum, it remains highly noteworthy in its own way. 'It's impressive to see how the team in the third year running now...we seem to be the quickest out there by a good margin' said Rosberg. 'The risk is when you're dominating you start to become complacent, and that's a big risk always...it seems that we're able to push through'.

Lewis concurred: 'They've [Mercedes] raised the bar once more, in their third year [at the front]'.

Showing the onward march of progress in this game too Lewis's pole time was a whole 2.5 seconds up on last year's, and some 5.5 seconds up on the best dry time from 2014.

As intimated Ferrari filled the second row and on today's evidence Vettel retains the Ferrari whip hand as he had upwards of three tenths over his stable mate Kimi Raikkonen. The hoo-ha also took attention away from other worthy performances, not least from Toro Rosso which made good on its fine testing form with P5 and P7 on the Melbourne starting grid. Max Verstappen leads the pair and in so doing achieved the best qualifying position for a teenager since 1961. McLaren showed up better than testing suggested, and a lot better than it did 12 months ago, as it lingers just outside the top 10 with Fernando Alonso P12 and Jenson Button P13.

In time today's goings-on will become a mere memory; and aberration presumably. And the things from on-track today such as those outlined in the previous paragraph likely will become the more instructive matters to take away. Though the continuing preponderance of Mercedes, and of Lewis Hamilton, will likely be the most instructive one of all.



Author: Graham Keilloh

TWITTER: @TalkingaboutF1

Blog: talkingaboutf1.com

Want to be a guest writer on VitalF1.com?

It couldn't be simpler, just submit an article via this link OR drop us an email on f1@vitalnetwork.co.uk and we'll publish your views.



It's easy to join up and join in on VitalF1.com, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

If you are already a member of Vital Football, your logins will automatically work on VitalF1.com!






The Journalist

Writer: Red5 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday March 19 2016

Time: 3:36PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. DJ 1160
2. Red5 1120
3. The Fear 773
4. Villaininthemerde 612
5. johnkelv 601
6. Druss_the_Legend 590
7. Push The Button 503
8. col8 334
9. The Intimidator 211
10. VanGisbergen2013 168

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Was Hamilton right to move over for Bottas?
No 9%
Yes - It was a team order 30%
Yes - But naive team order 61%